Problems of the relationship of jusnaturalism and Positivism in modern western legal science
https://doi.org/10.53315/2949-1193-2024-3-1-20-24
Abstract
The article is devoted to the problems of the relationship between legal naturalism and positivism in modern Western legal science. Foreign jurisprudence places great hopes on the hybrid nature of their interaction. Goal: identification and analysis of the relationship between legalism and positivism in modern Western legal science. The article uses the following methods: comparative legal, analytical, logical. Results: there is every reason to believe that the future of legal philosophy remains largely behind the recognizable natural law theory of positive law.
About the Authors
G. S. Pratsko
Don State Technical University, Rostov-on-Don, Rostov State Transport University; Taganrog Institute of Management and Economics
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Doctor of Philosophy, Doctor of Law, Professor
Rostov-on-Don
Taganrog
Yu. I. Isakova
Candidate of Legal Sciences, Professor Don State Technical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Doctor of Sociological Sciences
Rostov-on-Don
References
1. Glos, G.E. The Normative Theory of Law. // William & Mary Law Review. – Vol. 11 (151), 1969. – P. 151 – 184.
2. Hart, H.L.A. The Concept of Law. – Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994. – 263 p.
3. Voegelin, E. Order and History, Volume II: The World of the Polis. – LA: Louisiana State University Press, 1957. – 300 p.
Review
For citations:
Pratsko G.S., Isakova Yu.I. Problems of the relationship of jusnaturalism and Positivism in modern western legal science. The Phenomen of Law and Legislation: Strategies and Methods of Cognition. 2024;3(1):20-24. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.53315/2949-1193-2024-3-1-20-24
Views:
96
Email this article 