Preview

The Phenomen of Law and Legislation: Strategies and Methods of Cognition

Advanced search

The role of courts in the implementation of the right to judicial protection of human rights

https://doi.org/10.53315/2949-1193-2025-4-2-45-55

Abstract

Relevance. The implementation of the right to judicial protection is primarily associated with the activities of judicial bodies. The court has a special legal status that distinguishes its role and importance from the position of other participants in the proceedings. In practice, the implementation of the right to judicial protection involves the implementation of procedural legislatively regulated powers by all subjects of the judicial process. Judicial structures also have the appropriate powers, which characterize the legal status of the court and its specifics. At the same time, the insufficiency of the development of the most important aspects of judicial protection, its basis and content, implementation mechanisms dictates the relevance of the designated topic. The relevance of the topic is also facilitated by the presence of a small number of scientific studies in the part of distinguishing the right to judicial protection from other rights, including procedural ones. Purpose. The article attempts to outline the leading role of the courts in the field of human rights protection. General scientific and special legal research methods are used as methods. The materials are the current legislation, Resolutions of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation, the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation. Conclusions: The court is the central element in the mechanism for the protection of human rights. As a state body vested with powers, the court has the right to issue generally binding legal acts. Judicial protection of human rights presupposes a procedural order that guarantees the observance of the rights of all participants in the process and interested persons. Such types of legal proceedings are constitutional, criminal, civil, arbitration and administrative legal proceedings.

About the Authors

E. A. Komandzhaev
Kalmyk State University named after B.B. Gorodovikov
Russian Federation

Doctor of Law, Associate Professor, head Department of Theory and History of State and Law

Elista



E. V. Krylova
Kalmyk State University named after B.B. Gorodovikov
Russian Federation

senior lecturer at the Department of Theory and History of State and Law

Elista



References

1. Боринос А.Е. Порядок рассмотрения и разрешения дел по корпоративным спорам в судах // Арбитражный и гражданский процесс. 2022. №5. С. 11

2. Валеев Д.Х., Нуриев А.Г. Допроцессуальный технический этап предъявления искового заявления в электронном виде и его особенности в контексте реализации конституционного права на судебную защиту в условиях цифровой экономики // Российский судья. 2019. №4. С. 4.

3. Колоколов Н.А. Статья 125 УПК РФ: сущность судебного контроля. // Уголовный процесс. 2009. №6. С. 3-11

4. Ростовщикова Е.А. Проблемы доступа граждан к административному правосудию В РФ // Устойчивое развитие науки и образования. 2017. №1. С. 51-59

5. Семенцов В.А. О разрешительном и контрольном направлении судебной деятельности в досудебном производстве // Российский юридический журнал. 2012. №1 (82). С. 85


Review

For citations:


Komandzhaev E.A., Krylova E.V. The role of courts in the implementation of the right to judicial protection of human rights. The Phenomen of Law and Legislation: Strategies and Methods of Cognition. 2025;4(2):45-55. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.53315/2949-1193-2025-4-2-45-55

Views: 17


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2949-1193 (Online)